The UK’s aeronautics regulatory authority is taking legal action against Ryanair in a quote to ensure it changes its policy on paying flight delay payment. As the diversion and succeeding hold-up were for security reasons and therefore outside Ryanair’s control (extraordinary situations) we regret to advise that no monetary payment is due under EU Policy 261/2004. The CAA have recently issued legal proceedings versus a number of airline companies (consisting of Ryanair) regarding compesnation in this location.
We likewise sustained expenses of 2 hotels in the UK which we had booked for when we had actually arrived back in the UK. The expense of a hotel in Cape Verde on the first night of our delay as they did not supply us with a hotel that was suitable for us with a baby (room with no area for a cot, no a/c, no kettle). Cellphone charges of roughly ₤ 150 as they chose not to supply us with a telephone to use and loss of earnings for a day due to the length of the hold-up. My question associating with this is do we pursue these costs from Thomas Cook directly or go through our travel insurance?
Simply to inform you I did made an application for a travel insurance coverage from my bank (Barclays) given that the time which AUgust 2013 when I applied for the travel loan until I returned from the getaway and back here in uk. So prior to the flight and for the entire getaway till we returned to uk we are complete covered with the travel insurance coverage. And as quickly as I came back, I did talked with the travel bureau and informed them about the delayed/ mayhem air travel that we experience.
We should have as I stated an excellent flight however all of this troubles and inconveniences, with kids in the flight. If you can assist us learn if we can obtain for a compensation which I think is not our faultbut we are worthy of to have a great air travel for what we have paid for. These is a London to Manila return travelling on a connecting air travel in one booking for 5 travelers 3 children with ages 7 years, One Decade old and a17 year old plus x2 grownups. Was anybody on the Thomsons TOM049, return flight from Cancun to Gatwick on 25 June 2014? I was aware the problem was attributed to a technical fault and so quoted the Huzar v Jet2 ruling.
So what began as an early morning air travel with the possibility of taking pleasure in a couple of hours sunlight in the afternoon ended up with an arrival in the early night with only just sufficient time to obtain to the supermarket prior to it closed. We were choosing the return and a week flight was also delayed by the very same sort of time so we simply had more time at the end rather than at the start. Once more a morning air travel was chosen and this has just been advised as being postponed by four hours.
The air travel from Madrid to London was fine, on time (although we had to. hold a little to land) and I got to the gate for the next air travel on time too. Simply as I showed up to the gate, the first delay was revealed, from 13:20 (local time) to 15:00, with no factor offered. Lastly, they decide to change the airplane for one that was arriving the airport (LHR, main Bachelor’s Degree center I expect) from another flight. They described it as ‘Amazing Situations’ which releases them from any type of compensation.
I’ve read the article and the remarks (very helpful!) and I seem like we should be entitled to payment. Our Ryanair air travel was postponed over 7 hours (from Madrid to London) and we were provided food and drinks claim flight delay compensation. However, due to the hold-up we missed our travel to the city and were forced to grab a taxi (it was way past midnight). Failure to check-in in good time will lead to you being denied boarding to the flight.
